Energy What happened? Eight years ago, the nation was energy confident. Our standing in the Middle East was at its zenith. The oil cartel
was in retreat; gasoline was affordable, even as automotive progress reduced
emissions from cars. Today, gas prices
have skyrocketed, and oil imports are at all-time highs. Foreign oil now
accounts for one-third of our total trade deficit. Meanwhile, domestic oil production has fallen
17 percent over the last eight years, as vast areas of the continental U.S. have
been put off limits to energy leasing — though we depend on oil and natural gas
for 65 percent of our energy supply.
Additional oil reserves and deposits of low-sulfur coal may be out of reach
because of unilateral designation of new national monuments.
By any reasonable standard, the
Department of Energy has utterly failed in its mission to safeguard America’s
energy security. The Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission has been no better, and the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) has been shutting off America’s energy pipeline with a regulatory
blitz that has only just begun. In fact,
36 oil refineries have closed in just the last eight years, while not a single
new refinery has been built in this country in the last quarter-century. EPA’s patchwork of regulations has driven
fuel prices higher in some areas than in others and has made energy supplies no
longer fungible. What meets EPA’s
standards in one city may not be legally sold in another. The result has been localized shortages and
sharp price spikes, as suppliers scramble to get acceptable fuels to the markets
where they are needed.
Environmental concerns are not at the
heart of the matter. In fact, the
current administration has turned its back on the two sources that produce
virtually all of the nation’s emission-free power: nuclear and hydro, the
sources for 30 percent of the country’s electricity. Because of cumbersome federal relicensing of
hydro and nuclear operations, we face the prospect of increasing emissions and
dirtier air. Meanwhile, nuclear plants
are choking on waste because the current administration breached its contract to
remove it — and then vetoed bipartisan legislation to store it at a safe,
permanent repository for which the taxpayers have already paid $7 billion. At the same time, power-producing dams are
being torn down, by federal edict, in energy-short areas, and the Pacific
Northwest is their next target.
Breaching dams would not only raise electric rates but would deny western
farmers irreplaceable water for irrigation and a cost-effective means of moving
their crops to West Coast ports. We
should develop and use technologies that will help entrance salmon runs while
keeping the dams in place.
It’s a man-made nightmare, but at
last the public is waking up and demanding change. What is at stake, after all, is not just the
price we pay to heat and cool our homes.
What is at stake is the nation’s New Economy, which relies heavily on
electricity for its infrastructure and on petroleum for its trade. Affordable energy, the result of Republican
policies in the 1980s, helped create the New Economy. If we do not carefully plan for our energy
needs, the entire economy could be significantly weakened. The Republican Congress has moved to
deregulate the electricity industry and empower consumers through a competitive
market — but congressional Democrats are holding up the process, and the
administration has provided no leadership. America needs a national energy strategy —
and a Republican president will work with congressional Republicans to enact
their National Energy Security Act. That
strategy will:
-
Increase domestic
supplies of coal, oil, and natural gas.
Our country does have ample energy resources waiting to be developed, and there
is simply no substitute for an increase in their domestic production.
-
Improve federal
oil and gas lease permit processing and management, including coalbed methane.
-
Provide tax
incentives for production.
-
Promote
environmentally responsible exploration and development of oil and gas reserves
on federally-owned land, including the Coastal Plain of Alaska’s Arctic National
Wildlife Refuge.
-
Offer a degree of
price certainty to keep small domestic stripper producers in operation.
-
Advance clean coal
technology.
-
Expand the tax
credit for renewable energy sources to include wind and open-loop biomass
facilities, and electricity produced from steel cogeneration.
-
Maintain the
ethanol tax credit.
-
Provide a tax
incentive for residential use of solar power.
This agenda will reduce America’s
dependence on foreign oil, help consumers by lowering energy prices, and result
in lower carbon emissions than would result from the current administration’s
policies. To protect consumers against seasonal price spikes, that legislation
also authorizes a home heating oil reserve for the Northeastern States and
allows expensing of costs for its storage. It will also make low-income housing more
energy-efficient. All in all, it is a
dramatic reversal of the nation’s present course, and that’s just what America
needs: a balanced portfolio of energy options that is stable, secure, and
affordable, with minimal impact on the environment.
|
|
ACHIEVING ENERGY INDEPENDENCE
No strategy for American security is complete without a plan to end America's dependence on
Mideast oil. Today, the American economy depends on oil controlled by some of the world's most
repressive regimes. This leaves our economy dangerously vulnerable to nations that do not share
our interests. America too often is silent about the practices of some governments because we
depend on oil they control.
John Kerry, John Edwards and the Democratic Party believe a strong America must no longer
rely on the cooperation of regimes that do not share our values. We believe a strong America
must move toward energy independence.
In the Bush Administration, energy independence doesn't get a thought. Their energy policy is
simple: government by big oil, of big oil, and for big oil. This Administration let oil industry
lobbyists and executives write our nation's energy policy in secret. They even went to the
Supreme Court to stop the public from learning what they were doing. They've done nothing as
gas prices have soared to record levels. Even the Administration's own economists have found
that their energy plan will do nothing to reduce gas prices. This President's approach to energy
policy leaves America shackled to foreign oil, dependent, vulnerable, and exposed.
John Kerry, John Edwards and the Democratic Party believe in a better, stronger, more
independent America. We are committed to achieving energy independence, and we know we can
do it. Our ingenuity and determination built the cars we drive and the bridges we use. It electrified
rural America in the 1930s, and took us to the moon in the 1960s. Our resolve helped conquer
polio.
It's this simple: When we see a problem, we roll up our sleeves and solve it. And that's what we
pledge to do now.
Achieving energy independence will improve our ability to protect our values and interests in
the world. It will reduce energy costs for our families. It will create high-paying new jobs. And it
will improve our environment and make our people healthier.
Harnessing American ingenuity to create renewable energy. Our plan begins with
commonsense investments to harness the natural world around us—the sun, wind, water,
geothermal and biomass sources, and a rich array of crops—to create a new generation of
affordable energy for the 21st century. By mobilizing the amazing productivity of America's
farmers, we can grow our own cleaner-burning fuel. We support tax credits for private sector
investment in clean, renewable sources of energy, and we will make ethanol credits work better
for farmers. And we will ensure that billions of gallons of renewable fuel are part of America's
energy supply while striving for strong, national renewable energy goals.
Creating the energy-efficient vehicles of tomorrow. We support creating more energy-efficient
vehicles, from today's hybrid cars to tomorrow's hydrogen cars. We support the American
people's freedom to choose whatever cars, SUVs, minivans, and trucks they choose, but we also
believe American ingenuity is equal to the task of improving efficiency. We support improving
fuel standards, and because of the challenges this poses, we will offer needed incentives for
consumers to buy efficient vehicles, and for manufacturers to build them. We are also committed
to developing hydrogen as a clean, reliable domestic source of energy. Our economy cannot
convert to hydrogen overnight, so we will fund research to overcome the obstacles to hydrogen
fuel and continue our other efforts to achieve energy independence.
Moving beyond OPEC. We can improve our energy security in other ways. We will seek more
diverse sources of oil around the world and here at home. We support balanced development of
domestic oil supplies in areas already open for exploration, like the western and central Gulf of
Mexico. We support the expansion of new infrastructure to develop supplies from non-OPEC
nations like Russia, Canada, and nations in Africa. We will increase efficiency of natural gas use,
develop the Alaska natural gas pipeline, and enhance our nation's infrastructure to help supply
natural gas more effectively.
Electricity. We will work to create new technology for producing electricity in a better, more
efficient manner. Coal accounts for more than one-half of America's electric power generation
capacity today. We believe coal must continue its important role in a new energy economy, while
achieving high environmental standards. Working with the coal industry, we will invest billions to
develop and implement new, cleaner coal technology and to produce electric and hydrogen
power. We will also work to make sure that our people have access to an affordable, secure, and
reliable supply of electricity at all times. We support mandatory, enforceable reliability standards.
We also support public-private partnerships to make our power systems more flexible, resilient,
and self-healing—and more environmentally friendly than ever before.
Government as a role model. The federal government is the largest single consumer of energy
in the world. We will cut the federal government's energy use and challenge local governments,
corporations, universities, small businesses and hospitals to do the same.
Our commitment to conservation. A balanced energy policy must create real incentives for
energy conservation in our homes, our offices, our factories, and our infrastructure, saving money
and improving security even as it creates good jobs and rebuilds our communities.
With sixty-five percent of the world's oil reserves in the Middle East, we cannot drill our way
to energy independence. But we can create, think, imagine, and invent our way there. And we will
create jobs, help our environment, and build a stronger country as we do.
|
| EnergyThe Issue: Government regulation of the energy industry has resulted in high prices, shortages, lack of competition, stunted exploration and development of alternative energy sources, and displaced responsibility for wrongdoing in the energy markets, while
granting advantage in existing markets to those with political
access.
The Principle: We favor the creation of a free
market in oil by instituting full property rights in underground oil and
by the repeal of all government controls over output in the petroleum
industry. Any nuclear power industry must meet the test of a free
market. Full liability -- not government agencies -- should regulate
nuclear power. We oppose all government control of energy pricing,
allocation, and production, such as that imposed by the Department of
Energy, state public utility commissions, and state pro-rationing
agencies. We oppose the creation of any emergency mobilization agency in
the energy field, which would wield dictatorial powers in order to
override normal legal processes.
Solutions: All
government-owned energy resources should be turned over to private
ownership. Nuclear energy should be denationalized and the industry's
assets transferred to the private sector. We oppose all government
subsidies for energy research, development, and operation. We oppose all
direct and indirect government participation in the nuclear energy
industry, including subsidies, research and development funds,
guaranteed loans, waste disposal subsidies, and federal uranium
enrichment facilities.
Transitional Action: The Nuclear
Regulatory Commission should be abolished. The Price-Anderson Act,
through which the government limits liability for nuclear accidents and
furnishes partial payment at taxpayer expense, should be repealed. We
support abolition of the Department of Energy and the abolition of its
component agencies, without their transfer elsewhere in the government.
We oppose all government conservation schemes through the use of taxes,
subsidies and regulation. We oppose the "strategic storage" program, any
attempt to compel national self-sufficiency in oil, any extension of
cargo preference law to imports and any attempt to raise oil tariffs or
impose oil import quotas.
|
|